I was reading an interesting article on medical diagnosis in the New York Times magazine this weekend. The article was about how 5 doctors had failed to diagnose a simple ailment despite the telltale symptoms on the patients legs and ankles. Yet, when the patient met with a specialist, her illness was instantly recognized. Here's the paragraph that caught my attention:
When we teach residents and medical students, we teach diagnosis as if it were a methodical process that moves from symptom to disease identification in a thorough, careful and logical manner. But the best diagnosticians often move from presentation to diagnosis in an instant, bypassing the reason and logic with an almost instantaneous recognition of the pattern of a disease.
Venture capitalists often talk about their desire to fund serial entrepreneurs. We also talk about the incredible value of domain expertise. I think this paragraph vividly captures the reason for our appreciation of both those characteristics. With experience and expertise, entrepreneurs are able to instantaneously recognize the patterns of disease and prescribe a cure. No early stage company I know has ever managed to succeed without growing ill every once and again -- a experienced doctor in the house is invaluable.
I would put this under "theory vs practice". VCs talk about finding great CEOs - in theory - but in practice I see time and time again VCs putting in, or letting slide, CEOs and other top management who have no clue how to run an organization. Many of the "serial entrepreneurs" in my experience are great at giving themselves loans, raises, and bonuses while running the company into the ground. Afterwords, they have "CEO" on their resume and can trick another VC into letting them run a company.
I think if you look at the database of VC companies for the last 10 years, you would find they don't have a good track record in picking management.
Posted by: realist | 07/21/2003 at 03:40 PM
Most investors would rather have their companies run by a battle-tested CEO who knows where the land mines are in an industry, even if they stepped on a few themselves instead of an "expert" who may have a MBA, but no real world experience. VC's are constantly trying to find a person that "gets it" and can lead the rest of the company in the direction of the business plan. When picking a CEO, VC's are looking for an elusive quality - the ability to quickly learn the rules of the game and run with the ball. Sure there are going to be some bad people running companies, but the inept and the outright crooks are hopefully weeded out.
Posted by: Marc H. Nathan | 07/22/2003 at 09:29 AM
Many years ago I worked (on contract) for a Government organisation which funded start-ups. One technically orientated start-up was causing concern as another round of funding was due. The Government depart was in liaison with a VC operation who intended to provide part of the further funding. I ran the rule over the operation, after which the VC president rang me. I had found that the management though probably good for a small concern was naive and too weak for a scaled up operation, but I had not yet reported this.
The VC interrogation went something like this. "Well lets start with the important things, what is the MD (Managing Director) like", I said slowly and somewhat defensively "Well". He interrupted and said "OK, so we need an new MD".
Harsh, arbitrary, but absolutely right. Frequently you can walk into a company, and without any due diligence, know if it is right or wrong. It may be gut feeling, compiled knowledge but you need to take notice of it.
Posted by: John Hulbert | 08/27/2003 at 02:06 AM
Sorry the email address on the last post was wrong (an old entry remembered by my computer).The correct address is John@hulbert.net
Posted by: John Hulbert | 08/27/2003 at 02:23 AM
I've follwed that are being made in the Social Networking world are much more provoking and exciting to me than any contemporary art I've come across lately.
Posted by: dollar items | 12/29/2010 at 12:14 AM
This is my 3rd pair. I buy a new pair when I wear out the old ones because they are the best "go-to" shoe for a comfortable walk, a long day of shopping and just hanging out. Sooooo comfortable.
Posted by: cheap turf cleats | 08/25/2011 at 01:30 AM