Standardizing The Comparison Slide

On Friday I was meeting with an interesting company. Their presentation was going along well and then we hit the dreaded competition comparison slide. You know the slide -- it is the one where you try to make clear that your product/service is better than everything else in the market. I've written about the competition slide before. It comes in a bunch of different forms but it is usually a list of attributes that your product/service has and that your competition's product/service doesn't. The degree to which an attribute is held by your product or the competition's product is indicated by a number of different codes -- circles, checks, percentages, even smiley faces. And, of course, there are always degrees of attribute compliance. Circles become circles, half circles, shaded circles, empty circles, full circles. Checks become check plusses, check minuses, half checks, grey checks. Percentages are used with incredible granularity (how does a product have 36% of an attribute?).

Given the myriad of codes used to depict product superiority, I find myself spending the first minutes of any such slide just trying to crack the code. Is a grey check better than a black check? Is a black circle faster/slower/bigger/smaller/cheaper/deeper/whatever than a red circle? (hint: look at the presenter's product column -- whatever they've got is what you want). In this era of standardization, I think it is time to standardize the comparison slide. And, for the sake of debate (we all know it takes a long time to reach consensus on any standard), I propose a standard -- the Consumer Reports ranking system. We've all gone to Consumer Reports when shopping for a car or a vacuum cleaner or a stroller. We've all seen the Consumer Reports bubbles. And we all know that it is better to have a full red circle than a full black circle (let me review -- the good folks at the Consumers Union have determined that the full red circle is excellent, the half red circle is very good, the empty circle is good, the half black circle is fair, and the full black circle is poor -- got it?). OK, truth be told, I don't care if you adopt my standard. But I sure would like some standard, so that I can focus on the information in your presentation, and not on deciphering your code.

Comments

[Frank A]

Over the years I've presented and received many of these slides. I've learned two things:

1) Ignore these slides. Ask the presenter to "net-out" why they are different and why it matters. If they can't explain it to you in simple terms, then they won't be able to explain it to a customer either.

2) The most important purchasing criteria are often not on the slide -- because they're not features of the product. I've worked in the telco equipment space for years and, in general, the most important criteria is a badge that says "Alcatel," "Nortel," (still true even with their recent struggles), etc. The exception is when you are the only game in town for the product. If that's the case, however, it should be pretty easy to explain a company's differentiation.

[Sean]

In many situations, I've never understood why customers or investors think the company would have the best insight on how they rank against their competitors when their competitors are doing their best to hide information from them. It might be different if the competition is so well known that their functionality is taken for granted (i.e. my new whiz-bang word processor vs. Microsoft Word) but in that case, 1) it better be an awesome differentiator, 2) you probably don't need a complex matrix anyway.

[michael sippey]

(They're called "Harvey Balls," in case you were curious.)

http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=29050

and

http://www.sippey.com/archives/000952.php

[miko]

I agree, but the only way to standardize the comparisons is to use a neutral third party organization with some editorial system for such comparisons. Disclaimer: I work for the Middleware company and we are a neutral third party organization =)

Anyhow, easy way to cut through the BS is to ask for reference customers and ask point blank why they chose that vendor.

[kirk otis]

I understand the problem, lots of the charts take time for the audience to understand "language" before they can understand the information, but you miss a bigger issue.

The items, the features being communicated. The metrics are more important than the art used to communicate. For example one company will say ASIC for speed and the other company will say software for flexibility... and both will give themselves four nice, round, bright red Harvey Balls...

[Manu Sharma]

The bigger issue here is that Powerpoint is a dangerous tool to assess [or demonstrate] complex issues like probable damage to a spacecraft in an accident or the likely returns of a proposed investment.

http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint

http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/discourse

[Abdul Kundi]

Dear David

My name is Abdul Kundi and I am founder of a start-up company that is planning to provide consumer services to cell phone users. While the engineers are working on the prototype I am educating myself in preparing for presentation to angel and venture investors. The information provided at ventureblog is priceless, as they say in mastercard ads. And best of all I don't have to pay equity for this education.

I salute to u and your colleagues for this education.

Regards

Abdul Q. Kundi

Ciphone.com (site not live yet)

[Air force one]

I saw the film name the circle of friend,it was exacted to us.and we will be friends each other in the future,and your articles are so cool,and I hope you will see my website also,so link my name and see some good produces I have,perhaps you will order some,believe me,come on!

[Jordan Sneakers]

Cool articles,I think you tested so many different lives,and many different people,I think the life is the best way to develop our thoughts.learn by you,thanks.

[christian louboutin]

I have just finished the article.It is the first time for me to read the whole post carefully,I always just look through the article,and forget quickly.But I had save your articl,it is more than useful to me.

[christian louboutin]

I have just finished the article.It is the first time for me to read the whole post carefully,I always just look through the article,and forget quickly.But I had save your articl,it is more than useful to me.

[air yeezy]

I am denser than I thought! I love them and will approach the guild about buying them.

[coach outlet]

I think you tested so many different lives,and many different people,I think the life is the best way to develop our thoughts.But I had save your articl,it is more than useful to me.

[nike air max]

I’ve been following your website for 5 days now and I should tell you I get somedgdrthing new from your post. and now how do I subscribe to your website?

[DEKARONデカロン-RMT]

DEKARONデカロン-RMT of a site.rmt ff11 The cost of a site would be how much it costs to run it. The worth of a site is determined mainly by how much revenue the site is bringing in.信長の野望Online RMT Other factors would include how much traffic the site is bringing in on a monthly basis, email subscribers if any,アラド戦記 rmt rmt ドラゴンネスト メイプルストーリー RMT アラド戦記 rmt rmt アラド rmt ff11 信長の野望Online RMT 大航海時代-RMT DEKARONデカロン-RMT

[Supra Shoes]

I don't feel up to that.

[Herve Leger Dress]

It is actually truly beneficial to read your net. The information amongst your weblog is strictly superb, and your blog system is Basic type, It isn't dazzied. So superb.

[new football boots]

Estos zapatos posen una gran calidad, considero que fueron la mejor eleccion son muy comodos y confortables, este es el zapato que pueden usar jovenes y ancianos son muy pero muy comodos, estoy en espera para comprar otro par para mi padre.

[orjin kremi]

Orjin kremi sayesinde artik tum agrilariniz son bulacak.

[perfect steps]

Thank you job

[panax]

panax kremi sayesinde artik tum agrilariniz son bulacaktır.

[v-pills]

v-pills yetkili satıcısı