RSS - Really Something Special?
Is RSS for real, or is it today's Social Networking?
It is hard to travel Silicon Valley these days without hearing the term RSS. People who don't even know what the term means want to invest in it, create companies around it, or add it to their products. (VentureBlog's David Hornik correctly predicted the rise of RSS over a year ago). AskJeeves just purchased Bloglines this week, spurring more interest in the space.
The core concept isn't new. Push technology was the hot trend of the mid 90's, spawning PointCast, Marimba and a host of others. What's changed is the wide adoption of RSS as a standard, enabling an explosion of new products and services.
Really Short History
At its core, RSS is just Really Simple Syndication - literally. That's what those three letters stand for. It is a way of organizing content so that it can be understood by a machine; kind of HTML for computers (in fact, RSS is a form of XML).
It was used long ago to serve up changing content to the portal at Netscape (for example, new AP news stories). Bloggers have since adapted it to serve up articles they write so they can reach their audience more easily. If I make this article machine readable, then you don't need to check VentureBlog every day to see if we've written anything new. Since we use RSS (via FeedBurner), your computer will do that for you. It can distinguish one article from another even if they're on the same page, and tell if a new one appears. Your computer can deliver it as a message to your email inbox, or create a page of all the interesting articles on the web that day. This has since extended to news sites (like MSNBC and CNN). Now other creative services on the web like Netflix are creatively using RSS to deliver new release information and recommendations.
Those are simple examples. Making the content machine-readable allows a host of new services and tools to aid you in navigating changing content on the web. Many are already in development.
RSS Landscape Today
RSS is developing in the same order as the World Wide Web: content, browsers, plumbing, media, and finally business.
On the web, a few scientific and academic sites had web pages, which led enterprising coders created browsers. The most popular of these, Mosaic, was eventually duplicated by the same team to form the basis of Netscape. Ultimately, Microsoft built it in to their products as Internet Explorer. Next, tools addressed the plumbing needed to manage all of the content: search, creation, management, security, personalization, serving, etc. Altavista, Excite, Yahoo, and a host of others were born. The media sites came along shortly thereafter (portals, mostly), and finally business came to the web.
While the evolution of the web was not as neatly organized as I've implied, that was the general development track of web businesses. RSS is going through the same phases, though much more quickly since people have the web model as a reference. The space is breaking down into similar stages:
-
Browsers (readers): As RSS spread widely, thoughtful engineers designed a series of useful readers. These allow you to specify the content you want, and the reader will find and deliver it to you. There are now many readers, including You Subscribe, NewsGator, and IntraVNews (for Outlook), SharpReader (Windows client), NetNewsWire (Mac), Bloglines and My
Yahoo (Web), as well as many others.
-
Plumbing: We are just starting to get tools to deal with the profusion of RSS content. These include?
- RSS Search engines: Technorati, Feedster, and others.
- Portals for RSS content: Technorati, FeedDemon, Bloglines, Syndic8, Del.icio.us, Blogdex, etc.
- Content Managers & Servers: Six Apart, Blogger, Feedburner, others.
-
Media: This has grown up with the readers. Some of the existing players are now supporting RSS feeds, and the blogging phenomena has thrown up some new stars (Boing Boing, Instapundit, Endgadget, etc.).
- Business: RSS is still in the plumbing phase, so business and commerce concepts, such as advertising inserted in RSS feeds or charging for subscriptions are just now starting to appear. Some companies are also starting to poke around consumer commerce - Dulance, for example, is providing RSS feeds of price search results, so you know when prices change on items you've been eyeing. Others are exploring syndication of business data, or using RSS as a business communications standard.
Unlike the original push towards push technology, the open RSS standard is already widely adopted. As with the web, this may allow a variety of interesting capabilities which extend RSS capabilities in different directions.
One direction relates to automating tasks for you. This is basically the return of agent technology. Now that a wider variety of web sites are available in machine readable format, it should be possible to tell your computer things like "tell me when an article about gnosticism appears". While this is similar to the stored searches on Google, the fact that RSS aggregators are closer to real-time makes this more valuable. The best analogy is "Tivo for the Web" - specify web sites to definitely "record" and the agent can also record a selection of potentially interesting web posts.
Another direction is enterprise use for RSS. Imagine replacing Microsoft Exchange with an interlocking array of RSS feeds. Each user with Outlook receives their shared calendar, contacts, and other information from subscriptions to RSS feeds. Or they become contributors, sharing one of their calendars with others. I'm sure reading that sentence inspires a host of potential objections for why RSS can not do that. Yet.
Overcoming those objections with new solutions will inspire a new wave of RSS companies, along with some of the current players. Existing enterprise solutions will then be able to adopt RSS as a communications mechanism that isn't limited by sharing a Microsoft Exchange server, allowing standardized information sharing. This direction more or less completes the promise of interoperability that began with XML.
As both examples imply, however, RSS is more evolution than revolution. It is not a brand new Internet; rather, it is an improvement on the existing one that has finally pushed machine-to-machine content communication over the tipping point. That certainly allows some interesting and very large opportunities, particularly in search and collaborative filtering (see the Attention.XML project). However, after several companies become successful laying down the plumbing and infrastructure to support it, for the most part it will become a tool integrated into existing platforms (much like XML).
Most of the future winners already exist, with only a few more to come in the infrastructure and business areas. While the space is evolving rapidly, I will be shocked if more than a handful of companies become large enough to be standalone ventures. More likely, current players will be acquired very soon if RSS does become mainstream for other applications.
In the meantime, we're finally getting a set of new content and services on the Internet. Enjoy.
Categories
Internet Infrastructure15 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: RSS - Really Something Special?.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://ventureblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/224
VentureBlog: RSS - Really Something Special?: RSS is more evolution than revolution. It is not a brand new Internet; rather, it is an improvement on the existing one that has finally pushed machine-to-machine content communication over the tipping poi... Read More
We're nothing but RSS producers. Or at least VentureBlog thinks so. My personal (very entrepreneurially skewed) theory is that companies tend to be valuable for three reasons: cold assets, technology or people. Cold assets are either capital or somet... Read More
RSS - Really Something Special? - Is RSS for real, or is it today's Social Networking?
It is hard to travel Silicon Valley these days without hearing the term RSS. People who don't
Read MoreKevin Laws at Venture Blog has a great piece on RSS. It is hard to travel Silicon Valley these days without hearing the term RSS. People who don't even know what the term means want to invest in it, create... Read More
Link: VentureBlog: RSS - Really Something Special?. Kevin at VentureBlog give an excellent overview of what you need to know about Read More
Ping Backæ¥è‡ªï¼šwww.donews.net Read More
Three recent articles about feeds syndication came to my attention today. What struck me is that they all concetrate on just one type of RSS, Really Simple Syndication, ignoring the other RSS and Atom. I've already written about these three Blog Re... Read More
Three recent articles about feeds syndication came to my attention today. What struck me is that they all concetrate on just one type of RSS, Really Simple Syndication, ignoring the other RSS and Atom. I've already written about these three Blog Re... Read More
There is a very good article on VentureBlog about RSS. It's history, what makes it different from push media products like PointCast and Marimba from the mid 90's. Read More
A great post on VentureBlog about RSS, another indication of an impending rise of "agent" applications. Tagsy is for the only service that is aiming at attacking this niche. Read More
Suite à quelques questions sur l'utilité du lien "Syndiquez ce site" à gauche de la page : il sert à pouvoir récupérer toutes les notes publiées sur ce site (et beaucoup d'autres : CNN, Glowria,...), au fur et à Read More
I found this on Venture Blog by Kevin Laws:
Another direction is enterprise use for RSS. Imagine replacing Microsoft Exchange ...Read More

Hi Kevin,
kind of interesting to read that you see a simple solution widely used as a potential core of new ventures... hmm... got me thinking that.
"Unlike the original push towards push technology, the open RSS..." I took as a between-the-lines understanding that RSS is push. Hmm again, I wonder. Or rather, here I balked.
If I open the window to let bird-chirping in - for me that's not push on birds behalf. If I close the window and the buggers start pecking, now that's another story. If I add an RSS link, now that is not push, not even for the sender, it's delivery. But if - as you suggested some ads found the way, well, that's push. Pushy as in not invited in fact.
And would that not be doing a dacapo on yesteryears push-technology? Another basic misunderstanding, forgetting that the web is all about pull and no thanks to push?
In other words, RSS as basis for something separate, I admit to being sceptical. RSS as a nice tool to enhance a real service, sure, I would say.
Thanks for listening, hope I'm too pushy :-)
Hi Kevin,
Great post. I made mention of it today on my blog(www.recruiting.com). If you have any thoughts on how RSS should be used for recruiting, I would love to hear about it and write about it on my blog
Thanks
Jason
Hi Kevin
Great post. We're also betting the company on RSS - our vision is to make RSS publishing easy for enterprise users - for corporate communications, marketing, customer communications, partner communications, etc
Thanks
Fergus
Kevin. A really good post, thanks.
One area that I see HUGE potential is in the distribution of video etc. (BMOs Big Media Objects as David Winer would have you call them!). The downside of online video is the wait related to downloads and streaming. Being able to go to, say, the Disney/ABC/BBC/Pixar website and subscribe to an RSS feed of "any new promo" or "any episode of Program X" or "any behind the scenes footage during the making of Movie Y" would be terrific. The video would then be delivered to your news/video reader, ideally using BitTorrent or its equivalent, so that the first time you knew a particular video was available, it would be on you desktop. This would eliminate the 'click and wait' cycle of boredom.
As the owner of an independent animation studio, I would love to see the day that we can provide RSS feeds of our creative output that can simply and straight forwardly be distributed to our adoring audience! :-)
If there is one fly in the ointment, it's how to make money from such activity - we could have a million subscribers for a particular show, but if we cannot make money, we cannot make it. Perhaps we could give low res versions away but charge for DVD quality?
IMHO RSS + BitTorrent + micropayments = an exciting low cost video distribution model. It would certainly give the current 'gatekeepers' something to think about...
BTW you might be interested in a couple of these articles from Mark Pesce, inventor of VRML:
http://www.mindjack.com/feature/redefiningtv.html
http://www.disinfo.com/site/displayarticle4565.html
http://www.hyperreal.org/~mpesce/fbm.html
RSS seems to have spawned at least one Venture Fund specializing in RSS related Startups. See below
http://news.com.com/RSS+lures+venture+capital+dollars/2100-1038_3-5778367.html